Multi-jurisdictional perspectives
Workshop Series 2 : 12.00pm - 1.00pm
Workshop Summary
Navigating Global FDI Filing: Managing multi-jurisdictional screening, remedies, and regulatory trends.
Speakers
Senior Advisor
Brunswick Group
Partner - Leading coordinator of global FDI reviews outside the US
White & Case LLP
Moderator
David Chekroun
Professor of Business Law — Avocat
ESCP
Co-Founder
FDI Control Forum
Key Questions
How can companies best navigate the complexities of multi-jurisdictional FDI filings, and what strategies are most effective for aligning timelines and regulatory expectations?
What trends are emerging around conditional approvals and remedies, and how can investors coordinate commitments across different national authorities
Should screening efforts between allied nations be reconsidered or streamlined, and what role can regulatory cooperation play in reducing unnecessary burdens?
As FDI screening regimes expand globally, investors increasingly face a fragmented regulatory landscape. While the U.S, the UK and nearly all EU Member States have introduced or updated FDI controls, there is little harmonisation in processes, timelines, or sectoral scope. This creates significant challenges for cross-border transactions, especially in strategic sectors such as energy, defence, and emerging technologies.
With more deals triggering multi-jurisdictional filings, navigating simultaneous notification processes and aligning regulatory timelines has become a critical component of transaction planning. Investors must also be prepared for the growing use of conditional approvals and national security remedies - ranging from governance restrictions and data access limitations to operational guarantees and divestiture requirements. At the same time, a large portion of FDI scrutiny involves transactions between allied countries, such as U.S–EU deals, raising questions about whether existing resources are being optimally allocated.
This workshop will explore how companies and regulators can manage overlapping filing obligations, coordinate remedies across jurisdictions, and anticipate shifts in global enforcement trends. It will also examine how national authorities are handling FDI from “friendly” nations and whether convergence in screening approaches may lead to more efficient frameworks.
Corporate Sponsors
Academic Sponsors
Sébastien Ouvry
Director — Investment Legal Eurazeo
Damien Levie
Head of Technology & Security, FDI Screening Unit
Directorate General for Trade,
European Commission